Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2006 – online /September – October 2006 /Sept. 18 – Sept. 24 Print | Send to friend

U.S. backs off on Iran's nuclear sanctions?



click here for related stories: peace/antiwar
9-21-06, 9:04 am


WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 (Xinhua) -- The United States, which warned time and again to impose sanctions against Iran, has softened its tone on Iran's nuclear program, the Washington Post said on Wednesday.

Slowly but surely, the White House has muddied what was once clear lines in pursuit of diplomacy, the newspaper said.

As recently as a month ago, U.S. President George W. Bush and his administration firmly demanded that Iran first suspend its nuclear activities before the U.S. would join negotiations on the nuclear program, "but now U.S. officials have quietly acquiesced in a European-led effort to find a face-saving way for the talks to begin," the article said.

"With allies balking, negotiations appear more likely than punishment," the article said. Bush, in his speech on Tuesday to the UN General Assembly, "used notably mild language when he disucssed Iran, suggesting that the two countries one day will 'be good friends and close partners in the cause of peace.'"

Referring Bush's latest speech that U.S. officials "have no objection to Iran's pursuit of a truly peaceful nuclear power program," the article said "this is a reversal from the policy in the first term, when U.S. officials loudly proclaimed that a country with such vast oil and gas reserves has no need for a nuclear program."

Under pressure from Europeans, the Bush administration dropped that argument late last year, the article said.

From Xinhua


» PA Home » PA Online Edition September Print Edition » PA Subscribe






blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org