Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Eight Rough and Random Thoughts on Socialism

Some Notes on Poverty and the Responsibility of Government

How About Two-and-a-Half? Thoughts on the Return of Social Democracy, part 1

Marxism, Queer Theory and the Love Debate

Engels on Human Rights and the Abolition of Classes

The FBI’s Surveillance of Congressman Vito Marcantonio

Women in the History of the CPUSA

Book Review: The New Class Society: Goodbye American Dream?

Book Review: A Country Called Amreeka

Poetry, March 2010

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2009 /April 1 – 30, 2009 Print | Send to friend

Iowa Supreme Court Strikes Down 1998 Law Banning Same-Sex Marriage



click here for related stories: LGBT pride
4-03-09, 11:18 am

Additional resources:
Political Affairs #96 - Cultural pluralism and the left in historical context






Original source: Pride at Work

In a unanimous ruling today, the Iowa Supreme Court upheld a 2007 lower court ruling that a 1998 law banning same-sex unions was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that the 1998 law violated the equal protection clause in the Iowa Constitution.

The ruling makes Iowa the third state in the nation to legalize civil marriage between same-sex spouses. Massachusetts and Connecticut are the others.

"We are thrilled that the Iowa Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Iowans is unconstitutional and an affront to the rights of all Iowans," said T Santora, Co-President of Pride At Work.

"Pride At Work looks forward to working with the Iowa labor movement to continue to raise its collective voice for justice for all workers, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender workers, who face a gauntlet of unequal workplace and family benefits due to our lack of access to the institution of marriage."

Right-wing forces will likely try to bring the issue up again via a constitutional amendment. The constitutional amendment process takes three-steps: approval from two consecutive legislative sessions and then a public vote. The earliest an amendment could be on the ballot would be in 2012.


| | | | Share | Add to Mixx! | Save to del.icio.us | Twitter
 

Home Podcast Editors' Blog





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org