Home  
0
0

Contact Us

Feedback Form

About Us

Web Links

Visit this group

Ponzi Capitalism and the Deepening Moral Crisis

The Roller Coaster: The Communist Party in the 1940s

Rebuilding the Labor Movement in the 21st Century, an Interview with Scott Marshall

Police Escalate Attacks on First Amendment Rights

Public Option: Worth the Fight

Our Socialist Inheritance and Future

Past, Present and Future: The Politics of Reform in the Era of Obama

Needed: Constitutional Amendment for the Right to a Earn a Living Wage

Why Should Grassroots Liberals Consider Marxism?

Is That Specter Really Collapsing?

Carlo Tresca: The Dilemma of an Anti-Communist Radical

The Brief, Revolutionary Life of Joe Hill

Movie Review: Giải phóng Sài Gòn

Review: Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth

Poetry, November 2009

/Archives - Dates and Topics /2008 – online /July – August 2008 /Aug. 1 – Aug. 31, 2008 Print | Send to friend

Activists Demand Investigation of Wal-Mart's Pro-McCain Policy



click here for related stories: elections
8-06-08, 2:10 pm

Union activists affiliated with the WakeUpWalMart.com campaign circulated a petition this week via e-mail demanding the Federal Election Commission investigate whether Wal-Mart has violated federal election laws. The multinational corporation, the campaign pointed out, may have broken the law when it held mandatory meetings for many of its employees this summer that appeared to "to intimidate rank-and-file employees into voting Republican."

Last week, an article in the Wall Street Journal revealed that Wal-Mart held mandatory meetings to convince employees that a Democratic victory would mean that Wal-Mart employees might have an easier chance of unionizing Wal-Mart stores and outlets.

Additional resources:
Podcast #80 - Why John McCain Shouldn't be President


Register to vote here
Specifically, Wal-Mart told its employees, according to the article, that a Democratic victory will usher in the passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. The Employee Free Choice Act has already passed in the US House and would remove barriers faced by workers who want to join labor unions.

The bill essentially imposes heavier sanctions against employers who use illegal threats and harassment to prevent workers from exercising their right to join a union.

Wal-Mart has fought for decades against labor union organizing in its stores. A recent e-mail alert from another organization, Wal-Mart Watch, said, "With weakened workers' rights, Wal-Mart can bully its employees to skip breaks and work 'off the clock' for no pay."

The alert also pointed out that "Wal-Mart has received numerous fines for violating the Family and Medical Leave Act – firing employees for taking federally protected medical leave." Wal-Mart Watch is circulating its own online petition that will be sent to the company's executives telling them to stop intimidating workers.

In 2007, Human Rights Watch published a report documenting Wal-Mart's systematic violation of workers rights in its stores. According to the report, the company uses unlawful threats of retaliation against employees, spying, and mandatory "captive audience" meetings to instill its anti-union message along with its threats to new employees.

Most of these actions are illegal, but legal sanctions are so minimal that Wal-Mart has little incentive to obey the law, the report stated. The Employee Free Choice Act would provide that incentive.

One anonymous employee said the message of the mandatory Wal-Mart meetings was clear. "I am not a stupid person. They were telling me how to vote," the Wall Street Journal article quoted her as saying. Other employees were told that voting for John McCain was the right choice to make.

The WakeUpWalMart.com petition states, "Wal-Mart's motives are a moot point. The company has crossed the line, again, and it's time to hold them accountable."

--Reach Joel Wendland at jwendland@politicalaffiars.net

| | | Share on Facebook | Add to Mixx! | Save Page to del.icio.us | Twitter
 

Home Podcast Editors' Blog





blog comments powered by Disqus
Take a Stand
( 10/01/2003 18:49 )


newcatcher@cpusa.org