I confess I have had a long-time allergy to David's writing on globalization and immigration, for which no doubt I should be criticized. He always makes many true, well researched and worthy points, especially with respect to the very difficult -- intolerable -- conditions undocumented workers confront.
But I do not understand his remedies -- which sound like little more than slogans to me: viz a viz: "Can all workers unite and defeat division: YES WE CAN!"
With 10% official unemployment, what SHOULD the border policy really be? Open? Is that a serious proposal? Could anyone win working class unity -- and elections -- on that? IN addition, how do we define an INTERNATIONALIST position on this question -- not just in abstractions -- but based on the real positions and interests of working class forces on BOTH sides of the border? Don't these forces have to have MEETINGS in order to find both practical and principled common ground? And where is the assessment of what the majorities of workers on both sides of the border think about these problems -- and thus the tactics of moving forward? David's article begs answers to these questions, but they are not, IMHO, forthcoming.
OK -- let David's article(s) be an unmet challenge for the Left: It is relatively easy to know that the corruption and racism of the Arizona right-wing governor and legislature is wrong. But the left cannot run for and win governorships of border states on that alone. It is an ideological and political failure of great magnitude not to have a more fully developed understanding and position on this. But -- maybe I have just not read the right things!
Comment!!!
jcase