Back to the 19th Century

phpSrg0A5.jpg

6-10-09, 9:18 am



Original source: Morning Star (Britain)

While Obama proclaims the 21st century, the government of Israel is returning to the 19th.

One man spoke to the world, and the world listened.

He walked onto the stage in Cairo alone, without hosts and without aides, and delivered a sermon to an audience of billions. Egyptians and US citizens, Israelis and Palestinians, Jews and Arabs, Sunnis and Shi'ites, Copts and Maronites - and they all listened attentively.

He unfolded before them the map of a new world, a different world, whose values and laws he spelled out in simple and clear language – a mixture of idealism and practical politics, vision and pragmatism.

Barack Hussein Obama, as he took pains to call himself, is the most powerful man on earth. Every word he utters is a political fact.

'A historic speech,' pronounced commentators in a hundred languages. I prefer another adjective – the speech was right.

Every word was in its place, every sentence precise, every tone in harmony. The masterpiece of a man bringing a new message to the world.

From the very first word, every listener in the hall and in the world felt the honesty of the man, that his heart and his tongue were in harmony, that this is not a politician of the old familiar sort – hypocritical, sanctimonious, calculating. His body language was speaking and so were his facial expressions.

That's why the speech was so important. The new moral integrity and the sense of honesty increased the impact of the revolutionary content.

And a revolutionary speech it certainly was.

In 55 minutes, it not only wiped away the eight years of George W Bush but also much of the preceding decades, from World War II on.

The US ship has turned, not with the sluggishness everyone would have expected, but with the agility of a speedboat. That is much more than a political change. It touches the roots of the US national consciousness. The president spoke to hundreds of millions of US citizens no less than to a billion Muslims.

US culture is based on the myth of the Wild West, with its good guys and bad guys, violent justice, dueling under the midday sun. Since the US nation is composed of immigrants from all over the world, its unity seems to require a threatening, world-encompassing evil enemy, like the nazis and 'the Japs' or 'the Commies.' After the collapse of the Soviet empire, this role was taken over by Islam.

Cruel, fanatical, bloodthirsty Islam. Islam as the religion of murder and destruction. An Islam lusting for the blood of women and children. This enemy captured the imagination of the masses and supplied material for television and cinema. It provided lecture topics for learned professors and fresh inspiration for popular writers. The White House was occupied by a moron who declared a worldwide 'war on terrorism.'

'During the last few years, successive Israel has ridden the wave of Islamophobia that has spread throughout the West'

When Obama is now uprooting this myth, he is revolutionising US culture. He wipes away the picture of one enemy without painting another in its place. He preaches against the violent, adversary attitude itself and starts to work to replace it with a culture of partnership between nations, civilizations and religions.

I see Obama as the first great messenger of the 21st century. He is the son of a new era, where the economy is global and the whole of humanity faces the danger to the very existence of life on the planet Earth. An era where the internet connects a boy in New Zealand with a girl in Namibia in real time, where a disease in a small Mexican village spreads all over the globe within days.

This world needs a world law, a world order, a world democracy. That's why this speech really was historic – Obama outlined the basic contours of a world constitution.

While Obama proclaims the 21st century, the government of Israel is returning to the 19th.

That was the century when a narrow, egocentric, aggressive nationalism took root in many countries. A century that sanctified the belligerent nation which oppresses minorities and subdues neighbors. The century that gave birth to modern anti-semitism and to its response, modern zionism.

Obama's vision is not anti-national. He spoke with pride about the US nation. But his nationalism is of another sort – an inclusive, multicultural and non-sexist nationalism, which includes all the citizens of a country and respects other nations.

This is the nationalism of the 21st century, which is inexorably striving towards supranational, regional and worldwide structures.

Compared to this, how miserable is the mental world of the Israeli right. How miserable is the violent, fanatical-religious world of the settlers, the chauvinist ghetto of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and Defence Minister Ehud Barak, the racist-fascist closed-in world of their Kahanist allies.

One has to understand this moral and spiritual dimension of Obama's speech before considering its political implications. Not only in the political sphere are Obama and Netanyahu on a collision course. The underlying collision is between two mental worlds which are as distinct from each other as the sun and the moon.

In Obama's mental world, there is no place for the Israeli right or its equivalents elsewhere. Not for their terminology, not for their 'values' and still less for their actions.

In the political sphere, too, a huge gap has opened up between the governments of Israel and the US.

During the last few years, successive Israeli governments have ridden the wave of Islamophobia that has spread throughout the West. The Islamic world was considered the deadly enemy, the US was galloping grimly towards the clash of civilizations. Every Muslim was a potential terrorist.

Israel's right-wing leaders could rejoice. After all, the Palestinians are Arabs, the Arabs are Muslims, the Muslims are terrorists, so that Israel was assured a central place in the war of the sons of light against the sons of darkness.

That was a Garden of Eden for racist demagogues. Lieberman could advocate the expulsion of the Arabs from Israel, Ellie Yishai could enact laws for the revocation of the citizenship of non-Jews. Obscure members of the Knesset could grab headlines with Bills that might have been conceived in Nuremberg.

This Garden of Eden is no more. Whether the implications will become clear quickly or slowly the direction is obvious. If Israel continues on its path, we will become a leper colony.

The tone makes the music – and this applies also to the president's words on Israel and Palestine. He spoke at length about the Holocaust, honest and courageous words full of empathy and compassion which were received by the Egyptians in silence but with respect. He stressed Israel's right to exist. Without pausing he spoke about the suffering of the Palestinian refugees, the intolerable situation of the Palestinians in Gaza, Palestinian aspirations for their own state.

He spoke respectfully about Hamas. Not any more as a 'terrorist organisation,' but as a part of the Palestinian people. He demanded that it recognise Israel and stop violence, but also hinted that he would welcome a Palestinian unity government.

The political message was clear and unequivocal – the two-state solution will be put into practice. He himself will see to that. Settlement activity must cease. Unlike his predecessors, he did not stop at speaking about 'Palestinians,' but uttered the decisive word 'Palestine,' the name of a state and a territory.

And no less important, the Iran war has been struck from the agenda. The dialogue with Tehran, as a part of the new world, is not limited in time. As from now, no-one can even dream about a US OK for an Israeli attack.

How did official Israel respond? The first reaction was denial. 'An unimportant speech.' 'There was nothing new.' The establishment commentators picked out a few pro-Israeli sentences from the text and ignored all the others. And, after all, 'these are just words. So he talked. Nothing will come out of it.'

That is nonsense. The words of the US president are more than words. They are political facts. They change the perception of hundreds of millions. The Muslim public listened. The US public listened. It may take some time for the message to sink in. But, after this speech, the pro-Israel lobby will never be the same again.

The era of 'foile shtik' – Yiddish for sneaky tricks – is over. The sly dishonesty of a Shimon Peres, the guileful deceits of an Ehud Olmert, the sweet talking of a Bibi Netanyahu, all these belong to the past.

The Israeli people must now decide – whether to follow the right-wing government towards an inevitable collision with Washington, as the Jews did 1,940 years ago when they followed the Zealots into a suicidal war on Rome – or to join Obama's march towards a new world.

--Uri Avnery is an Israeli journalist, peace activist and former Knesset member. He is one of the founders of Gush Shalom, a broad-based Israeli peace group.