The Con Job of Libertarian "Economics"

Capitalism 2

The rise of the so-called "tea party" movement has given a big boost to Libertarian economics, also known as "the Austrian School," a branch of thought that, although it calls itself economics, is better termed a Utopian philosophy. Ever since Paul Samuelson (and even Milton Friedman), academic economics have tried to define a more scientific framework for economics. In general this has meant applying statistical modeling, and formal definitions to various actors in the economy, including both public and private institutions as well as individuals and groups, that can then be applied to surveys and other data. You cannot ever make economics non-political since class and other interests of course also economic interests. But Samuelson hoped to move the economic debate from the realm of mostly ideology, to the realm of mostly evidence driven analysis.

"The Austrian School" is the opposite of a data or evidence driven framework. Texas Congressman Ron Paul is undoubtedly the most influential American advocate. Instead of paying any attention to data, it accepts as given from God (or nature) the transcendental "organizing" power of the market price mechanism. Its name derives from the identity of its founders and early supporters, Ludwig von Mises, and Nobel laureate Friedrich Hayek, both Austrians. the Ludwig von Mises Institute and Virginia based George Mason University are the principle US ideological centers of this trend.

Its principles are as follows:

1. The business cycle is a completely virtuous cycle. Slumps are the price we pay for booms. Recessions are the just punishment for the excesses of previous expansions. The fact that the rich reap the rewards regardless, and the poor are the ones punished regardless, is of no importance to the Austrian school. Every graph of the financial crises showing crashes and bubbles is just God's continuing morality play. Government intervention in this "virtuous" cycle prevents God and/or nature from rendering justice with the "tough love" everyone needs – and thus is evil. The Austrians are always in a state of continual frustration because no nation in the world seems to be willing to wait out financial crises and depressions trusting in the "magic of the market" to fix everything – that mirable dictu, keeps crashing and suffering from persistent instability. Instead of waiting for God's judgement, people – to the amazement of the "Austrians" – still resist walking calmly to the grave from starvation or homelessness!! They say: "if this is virtue, then the Devil has ascended Heaven." Nonetheless, the "virtuous business cycle of capitalism" has a certain seductive power. Not because it offers any solutions, but because it explicitly offers nothing: Welcome to God's Plan.

2.  The Austrian School rejects a scientific foundation to economics. The failure of any political regime to endorse the virtuous business cycle theory of the Libertarians gives rise to all sorts of political backwardness and numbness to reality in its supporters – listening to them frequently arouses a generous desire to help them with a wake-up "dope slap," after such tortured jewels as: "the people are too stupid to understand," or "the people are entitled to nothing," and other too-vulgar-or-racist-to-repeat sentiments. So few believe them, in fact, that they have become hostile to any group or government or institutional level of analysis at all. Instead they advocate strict adherence to "methodological individualism" – analyzing human action exclusively from the perspective of individual agents. Austrian economists also argue that mathematical models and statistics are an unreliable means of analyzing and testing economic theory, and advocate deriving economic theory logically from "basic principles" – read "divinely inspired principles" – of human action. They have even given their methodology a name, "praxeology." Additionally, renouncing science altogether, the Austrians reject experimental and empirical research altogether. They reject testability and falsification en toto. The great virtue (not!) of a theory that rejects testing and falsification is, of course, that it cannot be disproved!

3. The role of the state in Austrian and now Libertarian theory is more confused than its transparently false propositions on the business cycle. The first Austrian, von Hayek, was actually a social democrat and strongly supported standard social democratic policy on the key role of the state in providing services that were market failures. He differed only on whether the post office should be public or private. But latter day Austrians at the Von Mises Institute take this notion for a ride off the sanity cliff, calling for the end of public schools, roads, post offices, Internet, media of any kind, health care, retirement, fire stations, etc, etc, etc.

4. Like many cultish theories, libertarian economics rise in popularity reflects public dissatisfaction with the performance of large institutions in many areas of economic and public life. They often correctly identify corporate corruption as a source of the decay of these institutions, but rather than reform the corruption, they become captured by an attractive, but ultimately doomed, ideology that – due to its futility as a guide to leadership – strengthens the very corruption they decry.

Here is a "parable of the ship" from Mike Huben – a nearly perfect allegory of Libertarian and Austrian School Economics, that should serve you well in any debates:

The owner of a ship noticed that his ship was filling with water. Being an educated man (if not nautically trained) he knew there were many possible causes for water in a ship: leaks in the hull, the bilge pump being broken, waves washing over, condensation, and even the crew urinating in the hold. He heard the bilge pump running, he saw water from waves pouring in the open hatches, but worst of all he smelled urine in the hold! Being sensible, he ordered the crew to shut the hatches and then gave them a lengthy, stern harangue on hygienic use of the head. While he was lecturing the crew, his ship sank due to a combination of causes: large, unobserved leaks in the hull, a bilge pump that was running but not pumping correctly, and condensation that had shorted out warning circuitry.

Illustration by Alexei Talimonov

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • In Austrian Economic Business theory, that this ship owner shouldn't have been in the business in the first place is evidenced by his inability to run his ship safely. His business plan was unsustainable without help from someone else. That his ship sank is a regrettable but predictable result of the initial conditions. The only way to sustain his business would have been to have someone else fund him through education and assistance in maintaining his ship, in effect, pouring more money into the hold (the Keynesian approach), for this ship owner will doubtlessly sink any ship he is put in charge of. Hoping that all survive, it is also hoped that no one else would finance this incompetent and put him in charge of further capital. Unfortunately, allowing the inevitable to occur and others to learn from it is not what you're suggesting.

    Posted by Eric, 03/24/2011 11:23am (13 years ago)

  • This article reminds of the 2010 incident where they privatized the fire department in that town in Tennessee and because the guy didn't pay his fire protection fee the fire department watched as his house burned down. That is the real life result of libertarian Austrian school economics buddy. Read about it here: http://peoplesworld.org/in-tea-party-town-would-fire-fighters-watch-as-houses-burn/

    Posted by House on fire, 03/24/2011 7:51am (13 years ago)

  • Reminds me of a political article of mine years ago: http://www.politicalaffairs.net/defeating-the-ultra-right-know-your-enemy/

    This is a more economic take on the issue, via Alternet: http://www.alternet.org/story/18147/free_market_debunked/

    What the Libertarian politico fails to recognize is the that corporate power is a far greater threat to freedom than mere democratic government.

    For more on that, you may read Erich Fromm's "Escape From Freedom".

    For a stronger economic case, you might pick up John Kenneth Galbraith's "The Affluent Society".

    Or any book on history, circa the late 1800's, 1920's or the late aughts.

    Might I further suggest that, to test Libertarian's notion of the validity of private ownership, they each be given their own, individual Pacific Isle where they might prove us collectivists wrong by single-handedly constructing a modest house (with indoor plumbing and electricity), a car, basketball, and fine china in a year's time? Any takers?

    Dumb.

    Posted by Jean Paul Holmes, 03/23/2011 9:36pm (13 years ago)

  • Basically, you should let CEOs and bankers do whatever they want whenever they want and you create a perfect society. Oh wait that was in my pipe dream.

    Posted by Hayek handle, 03/23/2011 6:49pm (13 years ago)

  • DO NOT CRITICIZE HAYEK OR ELSE YOU WILL END UP LIKE OLOF PALME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Posted by Ron Paul's Internet Gestapo, 03/23/2011 4:44pm (13 years ago)

  • Amusing how not a single one of the criticisms of this article posted in these comments are substantive. They seem to be focused solely on encouraging the author to read more Austrians and maybe he will begin to believe in the cult too.

    Posted by Von Missed Again, 03/23/2011 1:33pm (13 years ago)

  • Amusing parable at the end. Sounds like the Republicans today: want create jobs: ban abortion.

    But seriously folks, how ironic is it that advocates of cutting government really only want government to work for their interests not their competitors?

    Posted by Tebow, 03/23/2011 1:29pm (13 years ago)

  • The dastardly Austrians want to end other things besides the internet! They want to do away with things like watermelons, drywall, carpeting, and even gravity!

    Posted by That aint all, 03/23/2011 1:10pm (13 years ago)

  • Krugman would be pouring more water into the ship himself in order to stimulate the bilge pump

    Posted by Karlis , 03/23/2011 12:54pm (13 years ago)

  • so praxis over praxeology eh? nice going.

    Posted by pravin, 03/23/2011 12:53pm (13 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments