Discussion topic: What's in a name?

The following articles represent the views of each individual author. Hopefully they will spark new thinking about how progressive, radical, and working-class activists can build the Communist Party and the broad struggle for social change in our country. Please post your thoughts below.

Shouldering Our Burdens
By Glenn Ramsey

In “Living in an Era of Change,” C. J. Atkins makes a disarmingly gentle, yet muddled case for name change. After an opening congratulatory appraisal of the Party’s past 20 years (of successfully avoiding name change while remaining politically dynamic), he proposes that the Party not only drop its “Communist” label, but its self-definition as a party. He makes this recommendation while failing to convince that the Party does not act like a party, based on his assumptions that a party, by definition, must independently present its own candidates in the electoral process.

Change is Essential, but What Kind of Change?

by Beth Edelman

For me the Atkins article was less about the name of the Communist Party and more about the content and form of the organization and its goal. The observation that the Party is small, and has been small for a long period of time should concern all members. And the desire for change is important.

Living in an Era of Change

by C.J. Atkins

The 29th CPUSA Convention was a big success and will hopefully go a long way toward improving the party’s contributions to the democratic movement.  The strategic policy of uniting all the core forces and movements to defeat the ultra-right and consolidate the people’s coalition was resoundingly re-endorsed by the delegates.  The quality of the discussion both before and at the convention reflected the hard work that members are involved in on the ground and a willingness to do the kind of hard thinking necessary to match it. 

Extreme Makeover Goes Too Far

by Joe Sims

C.J. Atkins, in his recent article "Living in an Era of Change," expresses a desire for a bigger socialist movement. To achieve it, he prescribes an “extreme makeover” for the CPUSA: first dropping communist from its title; and second dropping the designation “party” and becoming instead a socialist group  within the Democratic Party.

What's in a Name?

by: Dan Margolis

C.J. Atkins’ recent article, “Living in an Era of Change,” was a worthwhile piece that should be considered an important contribution to a discussion necessary for the Communist Party USA. The rejoinder by Joe Sims, “Extreme Makeover Goes Too Far,” did raise a number of conclusions with which this author disagrees.


Response to C.J. Atkins “Living in an Era of Change”


Reply to "Living in an Era of Change" by C.J. Atkins

Post your comment

Comments are moderated. See guidelines here.

Comments

  • Humor

    A teacher was reading the story of the Three Little Pigs to her class.

    She came to the part of the story where first pig was trying to gather
    the building materials for his home.

    She read. 'And so the pig went up to the man with the wheelbarrow
    full of straw and said: 'Pardon me sir, but may I have some of that
    straw to build my house?'

    The teacher paused then asked the class: 'And what do you think
    the man said?'

    One little boy raised his hand and said very matter-of-factly...

    'I think the man would have said - 'Well, I'll be ******!! A talking pig!'

    The teacher had to leave the room.

    ________________

    Posted by assimuggibmam, 06/25/2011 8:19pm (13 years ago)

  • <a href=http://karten.if.ua>yazon еврейская песня
    </a>

    Posted by owerrybes, 03/30/2011 12:13pm (13 years ago)

  • <a href=http://nesaw.rv.ua>скачать мультфильм ну погоди
    </a>

    Posted by Acouffchoof, 03/19/2011 4:03am (13 years ago)

  • The Joe Sims article is so powerful because it refers to facts of struggle,never leaving these facts to justify its position.
    As Communists,we must lead. We must not follow. We have the advanced methodology of changing reality,not interpreting reality.
    We have won,to a great extend the powerful allies of monuments-for instance MLK with this leadership,which will eventually lead to a post to "...restore democracy to this land." This quote from another immortal genius soul,the author of the timeless Souls of Black Folk,W.E.B. Du Bois.
    We are not a society of secrets,but an unbelievably bold and forthright group,which can indeed win the most direct,focused,and honest people to ourselves because we are the communists-nothing signals and pronounces this like the Marx/Engels Communist Manifesto of 1848. This short work is one of splendid genius,signaling an age of new authentic freedom,for, of, and by humankind.
    Let us be concrete,like the Joe Sims article urges us to be. Let us use the "scientific name" that the great Marx continuer,Vladimir Ulyanov Illich(V.I. Lenin)noted as such-communist.

    Posted by peaceapplause, 02/02/2011 11:56am (13 years ago)

  • The idea of the Party becoming a "Socialist group" within the Democratic Party has been done before. In 1944, then CPUSA General Secretary, Earl Browder proposed the same thing. Browder wanted to remove the name "Communist" as well but others in the Party at the time protested and the result was the Communist Political Association (CPA) which lasted for one year. This was the result of the "Spirit of Teheran" which overwhelmed Browder to such an extent that he forgot the lessons learned in previous struggles. For more information on this, read William Z Foster "History of the Communist Party of the United States".

    What happened was that Browder forced the American Communists to retreat on long established principles and, only before it was too late, in 1945, Browder was removed and the CPUSA re-established. As the CPUSA, the Party has made its strongest contribution to the socialist cause.

    Cooperation with other forces fighting for similar goals is necessary but the American Communists need to maintain their own presence and role.

    Posted by Ray Crandall, 01/07/2011 4:36pm (13 years ago)

  • I understand the temptation to change the name of the CPUSA, but find the focus on that aspect of the articles collected here as somewhat telling.

    As a marketing professional during the day (I'm just a CPUSA organizer in the evenings ;) ) I feel something is missing though -- a concrete study.

    If data on the subject were collected, I'd be far more likely to venture an opinion one way or another.

    Potential issues: 1) Shedding the "Communist" label might actually hurt the Party, simply because its "brand recognition" is powerful. When re-branding, it is important to not only consider brand perception, but brand recognition. The label is certainly strong. 2) Also, the name aligns well with the Party's values, and dropping it may actually matter little concerning the values of the Party will have only a small "market".

    Without data, my current opinion is that we have to try better to reach our "niche market" -- people for who the Communist label is not a turn-off.

    Balancing this "radical idea" with the need to recruit people interested in "real politics" is the catch.

    Hmmm...

    Is it possible for us to collect data?

    Posted by Jean Paul Holmes, 12/22/2010 12:22am (13 years ago)

  • Glad PA has collected all these articles into one place. Look forward to more discussion.

    Posted by C.J., 12/14/2010 12:11pm (13 years ago)

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments